A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF HONEY ON THE REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF NAKED NECK HENS

EFFECT OF HONEY ON NAKED NECK HENS PERFORMANCE

Authors

  • F. Raziq Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Tahir Khan * Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, poultryscience786@gamil.com
  • M. Imran Department of Poultry Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-25130, Pakistan
  • W. Khan Department of Poultry Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-25130, Pakistan
  • M. Mushtaq Department of Poultry Science, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar-25130, Pakistan
  • M. Arslan Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • M. Azhar Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • T. Asad Department of Poultry Science, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • S. Liaqat Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • M. A. Gondal Institute of Continuing Education and Extension, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • M. Rauf Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • G. Faran Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • Z. Farooq Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biosciences, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan; 9Department of Livestock Management, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan Uni
  • Z. M. Iqbal Department of Livestock Management, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • M. Qumar Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Science, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • F. Wadood Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Cholistan University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Bahawalpur-63100, Pakistan
  • H. Ali Food Safety Officer ,Office of Human and Animal Food Operation , 3310 Chatham rd, Springfield, IL 62704, USA
  • G. Abbas Department of Animal Production, Riphah College of Veterinary Sciences, Lahore-54000, Pakistan
  • A. Shabbir IMBB, The University of Lahore, Lahore-54000, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-1793-2024

Keywords:

honey, naked neck, egg quality, fertility, hatchability

Abstract

Honey is natural nectar that bees gather from a variety of flowers. Different chemicals found in honey are essential for the growth of tissues and organs in all living things. The goal of the current study was to compare the effects of three different honey concentrations [0 g (control), 5 g (group A), and 10 g (group B)] on the reproductive efficiency and egg quality attributes of naked neck hens over a 35-day period. A total of 90 (72♀:18♂) naked neck hens (75 weeks old) were stratified at random into three experimental groups, each with three replicates of 10 birds (8♀:2♂) each, under a completely randomized design (CRD). The experimental groups—control, A, and B received supplemental treatments of honey in drinking water at concentrations of 0 g/liter, 5 g/liter, and 10 g/liter, respectively. One-way ANOVA with CRD was used to analyze the data. In comparison to the control and group A, group B had significantly increased egg production, egg fertility, and egg hatchability. However, statistical analysis revealed no changes (P>0.05) in the fertile hatch rate between the treatment groups. In the first and second week of the experiment, there were no statistically significant differences between the eggs from different treatments in terms of eggshell weight and eggshell ratio. There were also no significant differences between three treatments in the thickness of the eggshells in the first week of the experiment. Nonetheless, when compared to the control and group A, a positive (P<0.05) effect was seen in the group B's overall means of egg weight, eggshell weight, eggshell ratio, and eggshell thickness in the third week of the experiment. Similar to this, group B had significantly higher mean values for egg length, egg breadth, egg shape index, egg volume, and egg surface area than did group A and the control. In conclusion, honey at a concentration of 10 g/liter (w/v) may prove effective when given orally to elderly laying hens.

Preliminarna ocena vpliva medu na reproduktivno zmogljivost kokoši z golim vratom

Izvleček: Med je naravni nektar, ki ga čebele nabirajo na različnih cvetovih. Različne kemikalije, ki jih najdemo v njem, so bistvene za rast tkiv in organov vseh živih bitij. Cilj te študije je bil primerjati učinke treh različnih koncentracij medu [0 g (kontrola), 5 g (skupina A) in 10 g (skupina B)] na reproduktivno sposobnost in kakovost jajc pri kokoših z golim vratom v 35-dnevnem obdobju. Skupaj 90 (72 ♀ : 18 ♀) kokoši z golim vratom (starih 75 tednov) je bilo naključno razdeljenih v tri poskusne skupine, vsaka s tremi ponovitvami po 10 kokoši (8 ♀ : 2 ♀) v popolnoma randomiziranem vzorcu (CRD). Poskusne skupine – kontrola, A in B – so dobile med v pitni vodi v koncentracijah 0 g/liter, 5 g/liter in 10 g/liter. Za analizo podatkov je bila uporabljena enosmerna ANOVA s CRD. V primerjavi s kontrolno skupino in skupino A so se pri skupini B znatno povečale proizvodnja jajc, oplojenost in valilnost jajc. Vendar statistična analiza ni pokazala sprememb (P > 0,05) v deležu oplojenih jajc med skupinami. V prvem in drugem tednu poskusa med jajci iz različnih obravnav ni bilo statistično značilnih razlik glede mase jajčne lupine in razmerja jajčnih lupin. Prav tako med tremi obravnavami v prvem tednu poskusa ni bilo statistično značilnih razlik v debelini jajčne lupine. Kljub temu je bil v primerjavi s kontrolo in skupino A v tretjem tednu poskusa opažen pozitiven (P < 0,05) učinek pri skupnih povprečnih vrednostih mase jajc, mase jajčne lupine, razmerja jajčne lupine in debeline jajčne lupine v skupini B. Podobno je imela skupina B bistveno višje povprečne vrednosti dolžine jajc, širine jajc, indeksa oblike jajc, prostornine jajc in površine jajc kot skupina A in kontrolna skupina. Zaključimo lahko, da se med v koncentraciji 10 g/liter (m/v) lahko izkaže za učinkovitega, če se daje peroralno starejšim kokošim nesnicam.

Ključne besede: med; goli vrat; kakovost jajc; plodnost; valilnost

References

Abdel Galil MA, Abdel Samad MH. Effect of vitamin E, C, Selenium and Zinc supplementation on reproductive performance of two local breeds of chickens under hot climate conditions. Egypt Poult Sci 2003; 24(1): 217–29.

Abioja MO, Adekunle MO, Abiona JA, Sodipe OG, Jegede AV. Laying performance, Survival rate, Egg quality and shell characteristic in laying pullets offered honey in drinking water during hot season. Agricultura Trop Subtrop 2016; 49(1/4): 12–9. doi: 10.1515/ats-2016-0002

Adebiyi OT, Majckodunmi BC, Adeniji OA. Effect of vitamin E and Selenium on fertility, hatchability and survivability of Turkey. J Anim Sci Adv 2014; 4(7): 955–61. doi: 10.5455/jasa.20140723035035

Ahmed NM, Abdel KA, Elamin KM, Dafulla KY, Malik HE, Dousa BM. Effect of dietary calcium sources on laying hens performance and egg quality. J Anim Prod Adv 2013; 3: 226–31. doi: 10.5455/JAPA.20130718034818

Al- Saffar AA, Rose SP. Ambient temperature and the egg laying characteristics of laying fowl. Worlds Poult Sci J 2002; 58(3): 317–31. doi: 10.1079/WPS20020025

Ali MN, Qota ENA, Hassan RA. Recovery from adverse effects of heat stress on slow-growing chicks using natural antioxidants without or with sulphate. Int J Poult Sci 2010; 9: 109–17. doi:10.3923/ijps.2010.109.117

Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones FT. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorns chickens and the relationship of egg shape to shell strength. Int J Poult Sci 2004; 3(1): 17–9. doi: 10.3923/ijps.2004.17.19

Aswathi PB, Bhanja SK. Effect of acute heat-stress on hatchability parameters of broiler breeders. Int J Livest Res 2019; 9: 90–4. 10.5455/ijlr.20191019022809

Austin S. Sexual performance natural supplements for boost sexual libido. Rev J Anim Sci 2011; 15: 1121–45.

Ayo JO, Obidi JA, Rekwot PI. Effects of heat stress on the well-being, fertility, and hatchability of chickens in the Northern Guinea Savannah zone of Nigeria: a review. ISRN Vet Sci 2011; 2011: 838606. doi: 10.5402/2011/838606

Bagde AB, Sawant RS, Bingare SD, Sawai RV, Nikumbh MB. Therapeutic and nutritional values of Honey (madhu). Int Res J Pharm 2013; 4(3): 19–22. doi: 10.7897/2230-8407.04305

Bains BS. The role of vitamin C in stress management. Misset World Poult 1996; 12: 438–42.

Bedford M. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: Implications and strategies to minimise subsequent problems. Worlds Poult Sci J 2000; 56: 347–65. doi: 10.1079/WPS20000024

Bjorneboe A, Bjorneboe GEA, Drevon CA. Absorption, transportation and distribution of vitamin E. J Nutr 1990; 120(3): 233–42. doi: 10.1093/jn/120.3.233

Blasa M, Candiracci M, Accorsi A, Piacentini MP, Albertini MC, Piatti E. Raw Millefiori honey is packed full of antioxidants. Food Chem 2006; 97(2): 217–22. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.03.039

Bozkurt M, Küçükyilmaz K, Çatli AU, Çinar M, Bintaş E, Çöven F. Performance, egg quality, and immune response of laying hens fed diets supplemented with mannan-Oligosaccharide or an essential oil mixture under moderate and hot environmental conditions. Poult Sci 2012; 91: 1379–86.

Ciulu M, Solinas S, Floris I, et al. RP-HPLC determination of water soluble vitamins in honey. Talanta 2011; 83(3): 924–9. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.059

Crozier A, Jaganath IB, Clifford MN. Dietary phenolics: Chemistry, bioavailability and effects on health. Nat Prod Rep 2009; 26(8): 1001–43. doi: 10.1039/b802662a

Deng W, Dong XF, Tong JN, Zhang Q. The probiotic Bacillus Lichenifortnis ameliorates heat stress-induced impairment of egg production, gut morphology and intestinal mucosal immunity in laying hens. Poult Sci 2012; 91(3): 575–82. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01293

Durmus I, Atasoglu C, Mizrak C, Ertas S, Kaya M. Effect of increasing zinc concentration in the diet of brown parent stock layers on various production and hatchability traits. Arch Anim Breeding 2004; 47: 483–9.

Ebeid TA, Suzuki T, Sugiyama T. High ambient temperature influences eggshell quality and calbindin-D28k localization of eggshell gland and all intestinal segments of laying hens. Poult Sci 2012; 91(9): 2282–7. 10.3382/ps.2011-01898

El-Neney BAM, Awadien NB, Eid YZ. The use of propolis as a source of natural additive to improve the productive performance and immune system of chickens local. In: 7th International poultry conference 2014.

Estevinho L, Pereira AP, Moreira L, Dias LG, Pereira E. Antioxidant and Antibactarial effects of phenolic compounds extracts of Northeast Portugal honey. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46: 3774–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.062

Etches RJ. Reproduction in poultry. Wallingford: CAB International, 1996.

Evans HM, Bishop KS. On the existence of hitherto unrecognized dietary factor essential for reproduction. Science 1922; 56(1458): 650–1. doi: 10.1126/science.56.1458.650

Fasanmi OG, Ajibola ES, Biobaku KT, Ajayi OL, Okediran BS, Adebayo A. Effects of administrating a combination of vitamin A and E on fertility and hatchability of Anak 2000 breeders. J Agric Sci Environ 2009; 9: 100–4.

Grieve D. Heat stress in commercial layers and breeders. Technical Bulletin . Iowa. Hy-Line international, 2003. https://www.scribd.com/document/84451325/0-Heat-Stress (8. 8. 2024)

Islam MA, Bulbul SM, Seeland G, Islam ABMM. Egg quality of different chicken genotypes in summer and winter. Pak J Biol Sci 2001; 4: 1411–4. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2001.1411.1414

Kienholz EW, Turk DE, Sunde ML, Hoekstra WG. Effects of zinc deficiency in the diets of hens. J Nutr 1961; 75(2): 211–21. doi: 10.1093/jn/75.2.211

Kirunda DF, Scheideler SE The efficacy of vitamin E (DL-α-tocopheryl acetate) supplementation in hen diets to alleviate egg quality deterioration associated with high temperature exposure. Poult Sci 2001; 80(9): 1378–83. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.9.1378

Lara LJ, Rostango MH. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals (Basel) 2013; 3: 356–69. doi: 10.3390/ani3020356

Lika E, Kostić M, Vjeśtica S, Milojević I, Puvača N. Honeybee and plant products as antimicrobials in enhancement in poultry health and production. Sustain 2021; 13(15): 8467. doi: 10.3390/su13158467

Mahmoud KZ, Beck MM, Scheideler SE, Forman MF, Anderson KP, Kachman SD. Acute high environmental temperature and calcium-estrogen relationships in the hen. Poult Sci 1996; 75(12): 1555–62. doi: 10.3382/ps.0751555

Mashaly MM, Hendricks GL, Kalama MA, Gehad AE, Abbas AO, Patterson PH. Effect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poult Sci 2004; 83(6): 889–94. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.6.889

Michalkiewicz A, Biesaga M, Pyrzynska K. Solid-phase extraction procedure for determination of phenolic acid and some flavonoids in honey. J Chromatogr A 2008(1/2); 1187: 18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.02.001

Osakwe I, Igwe R. Physiological responses of laying birds fed honey and vitamin C in drinking water. Nigerian J Anim Prod 2024; 212–4.

Putnam ME, Comben N. Vitamin E. Vet Rec 1987; 121: 541–5.

Richards JD, Zhao JZ, Harrell RJ, Atwell CA, Dibner JJ. Trace minerals nutrition in poultry and swine. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2010; 23: 1527-1534. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2010.r.07

Richards MP. Trace mineral metabolism in the avian embryo. Poult Sci 1997; 76(1): 152–64. doi: 10.1093/ps/76.1.152

SAS Institute. 2002-2003. SAS/STAT User’s Guide: Statistics. Version 9.1.SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC. https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/91pdf/sasdoc_91/stat_ug_7313.pdf

Seven I, Tatli Seven, P, Silici S. Effect of dietary Turkish propolis as alternative to antibiotic on growth and laying performances, nutrient digestibility and egg quality in laying hens under heat stress. Rev Med Vet 2011; 162(4): 186–91.

Steel RG, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.

Syazana NS, Hashida NH, Majid AM, Sharifah HAD, Kamaruddin MY. Effects of Gelam honey on sperm quality and testis of rat. Sains Malaysiana 2011; 40(11): 1243–6.

Tan HT, Rahman RA, Gan SH, et al. The antibacterial properties of Malaysian tualang honey against wound and enteric microorganisms in comparison to manuka honey. BMC Complement Altern Med 2009; 9: 34. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-9-34

Tappel AL. Selenium-glutathione peroxidase and vitamin E. Amer J Clin Nutr 1974; 27(9): 960–5. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/27.8.960

Vidanarachchi JK, Mikkelsen LL, Sims I, Iji PA, Choct M. Phytobiotics: alternatives to antibiotics growth promoters in monogastric animal feeds. Recen Advan Anim Nutr Australia 2005; 15: 131–44.

Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernandez-Lopez J, Perez-Alvarez JA. Functional properties of honey, propolis and royal jelly. J Food Sci 2008; 73: R117–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00966.x

Yousef MI, Salama AF. Propolis protection from reproductive toxicity caused by aluminium chloride in male rats. Food Chem Toxicol 2009; 47(6): 1168–75. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.006

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Raziq, F., Khan, M. T., Imran, M., Khan, W., Mushtaq, M., Arslan, M., Azhar, M., Asad, T., Liaqat, S., Gondal, M. A., Rauf, M., Faran, G., Farooq, Z., Iqbal, Z. M., Qumar, M., Wadood, F., Ali, H., Abbas, G., & Shabbir, A. (2025). A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF HONEY ON THE REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF NAKED NECK HENS: EFFECT OF HONEY ON NAKED NECK HENS PERFORMANCE. Slovenian Veterinary Research, 62(2), 107–14. https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-1793-2024

Issue

Section

Original Research Article